The Most Trusted Voice in Dot-Com Criticism

Bessemer Venture Partners

Venture Capital | Reviewed by Wavid Foster Dallace | January 12, 2026
6.1
Firm Information
Name: Bessemer Venture Partners
URL: bvp.com
Founded: 1911
AUM: $20B+
Type: Venture Capital

The `` tag tells you everything you need to know about Bessemer Venture Partners' $20 billion commitment to technical excellence. Here's a firm that's been funding innovation since 1911, backing everyone from Skype to Shopify, yet their digital presence screams "we discovered drag-and-drop last Tuesday." Their homepage loads with a sluggish 2.3-second LCP¹, powered by a bloated 847KB JavaScript bundle that's doing absolutely nothing except animating some portfolio logos with the subtlety of a PowerPoint presentation from 2003. The `bvp-hero-animation.js` file alone weighs in at 234KB—roughly the size of the original Doom executable—just to make their wordmark fade in with a gentle bounce that would make a jQuery developer from 2012 weep with nostalgia.

Diving into their source reveals a masterclass in Webflow's auto-generated class naming convention: `.w-layout-grid`, `.w-richtext`, and my personal favorite, `.w-slider-mask` wrapping what appears to be a manually curated carousel of portfolio companies that breaks spectacularly on anything smaller than an iPad Pro. Their CSS is a 456KB monument to specificity wars, featuring gems like `.portfolio-item-wrapper-container-inner-div` with `!important` declarations scattered like confetti at a New Year's party². The mobile experience is particularly charming—try scrolling through their "Anti-Portfolio" section on an iPhone and watch Safari's memory usage spike to 180MB as their intersection observer goes haywire, triggering repaints faster than a day trader's Bloomberg terminal.

The tracking situation reads like a privacy lawyer's fever dream: Google Analytics, HubSpot, Segment, Hotjar, and something called `bvp-internal-metrics.js` that's making requests to `analytics.bvp.com/track` every 3.7 seconds³. For a firm that presumably lectures portfolio companies about user privacy and GDPR compliance, loading 23 third-party scripts totaling 1.2MB seems deliciously hypocritical. Their Content Security Policy is MIA, their cookie banner appears 4.2 seconds after page load (perfect for those sweet, sweet unconsented pageviews), and their contact form POSTs to a Webflow endpoint that probably stores everything in plain text. The `X-Powered-By: Webflow` header is the cherry on top—nothing says "we're serious about technology" like outsourcing your entire web presence to a visual editor.

The real tragedy isn't the technical debt—it's the missed opportunity. This is a firm with legitimate wins backing companies that actually understand the internet, yet their own digital presence suggests they evaluate startups by printing out their pitch decks and faxing feedback. Their team page features 180x180 pixel headshots that look like they were extracted from LinkedIn profile pictures and compressed through a potato⁴. The "Careers" section loads asynchronously via a 67KB JSON payload that could have been a simple HTML page, because why serve static content when you can make browsers parse JavaScript to render "We're hiring!" in Helvetica Neue? Their footer contains 847 words of legal disclaimers but couldn't spare the bytes for proper `alt` attributes on their team photos.

VERDICT: A billion-dollar firm using a $12/month website builder is either the ultimate expression of lean startup methodology or proof that institutional investing and technical competence exist in parallel universes.